欧美人妻精品一区二区三区99,中文字幕日韩精品内射,精品国产综合成人亚洲区,久久香蕉国产线熟妇人妻

Tools with positive or negative rake angle are fundamental cutting instruments whose geometric angle design directly affects machining outcomes. Among these, the rake angle (the angle between the tool’s front face and a reference plane perpendicular to the cutting plane) is one of the most critical parameters. Based on the direction of the rake angle, turning tools can be classified into two main types: positive rake angle tools and negative rake angle tools. This article will systematically introduce the structural characteristics, working principles, and applicable scenarios of these two types of tools.

What Are Positive and Negative Rake Angle Cutting Tools? 2

Basic Definitions of Positive and Negative Rake Angle Tools

Positive Rake Angle Tool

A positive rake angle tool refers to a turning tool where the front face is inclined toward the interior of the workpiece relative to the cutting point, resulting in a positive rake angle (typically +5° to +15°). Its structural characteristic is a relatively sharp cutting edge, with a smaller contact area between the front face and the chip.

Negative Rake Angle Tool

A negative rake angle tool, on the other hand, has a front face inclined outward from the workpiece relative to the cutting point, resulting in a negative rake angle (typically -5° to -10°). Its structural feature is a blunter cutting edge, with a thicker and more robust tooltip.

 

Advantages and Disadvantages of Positive and Negative Rake Tools

Positive Rake Angle Tool

Advantages:

Lower Cutting Forces: A positive rake angle allows smoother chip flow and reduces deformation, decreasing main cutting forces by 15–25%.

Better Chip Evacuation: Shorter chip-tool contact length reduces built-up edge formation.

Suitable for Finishing: Minimizes vibration, enabling better surface finish (Ra < 1.6 μm).

Disadvantages:

Lower Tooltip Strength: The positive geometry reduces material support, making the tool prone to chipping in interrupted cuts or hard materials.

Poor Heat Dissipation: Smaller chip-tool contact area limits heat transfer, accelerating crater wear at high speeds.

Shorter Tool Life: Typically 60–70% of negative rake tools under the same conditions.

 

Negative Rake Angle Tool

Advantages:

High Tooltip Strength: The negative angle creates a “support wedge,” improving impact resistance by >50%.

Superior Heat Dissipation: Larger chip-tool contact area enhances heat conduction, reducing cutting temperatures by 15–30°C.

Multi-Sided Usability: Often designed with double-negative angles, allowing flipping for extended use.

Limitations:

Higher Cutting Forces: Negative rake increases chip deformation, raising main cutting forces by 20–30%.

Greater Power Demand: Requires 15–20% more motor power from the machine tool.

Vibration Risk: Prone to chatter in long overhang machining due to increased cutting forces.

Rake Angle?tool

Experimental Comparison

The following systematic experiment compares the performance of carbide positive and negative rake tools under different machining conditions, providing practical insights for tool selection.

 

Experimental Design

1.Materials & Equipment:

Positive rake tool (+8° rake angle)

Negative rake tool (-6° rake angle)

Both use YG8 碳化物 substrate with TiAlN coating and 0.4 mm nose radius.

2.Workpiece:45# steel (Φ50×200 mm), quenched and tempered to HRC 28–32.

3.Machine:CA6140 lathe with 3-jaw chuck and tailstock center.

4.Measurement Instruments:

Surface roughness tester (Mitutoyo SJ-210)

Electron microscope (OLYMPUS DSX510)

Cutting force dynamometer (Kistler 9257B)

Infrared thermometer (Fluke Ti400)

5.Parameters

Fixed: Depth of cut (ap = 1 mm), feed rate (f = 0.15 mm/rev).

Variable: Cutting speed (v = 60–180 m/min).

Three repetitions per condition for reliability.

 

Results & Analysis

Tool Wear & Life Comparison

Using flank wear VB = 0.3 mm as the failure criterion:

What Are Positive and Negative Rake Angle Cutting Tools? 3

Negative rake angle tools demonstrate significantly longer service life, exceeding positive rake tools by an average of 50-70%. Analysis of wear patterns reveals that positive rake tools primarily fail through crater wear on the rake face and tooltip chipping, whereas negative rake tools exhibit more uniform flank wear, demonstrating superior fracture resistance.

Cutting Force Comparison

What Are Positive and Negative Rake Angle Cutting Tools? 4

The data shows that under all tested cutting speeds, negative rake tools generate significantly higher principal cutting forces than positive rake tools, with an average increase of approximately 17%. This is attributed to the negative rake design’s larger contact area between the tool’s rake face and chips, as well as intensified cutting deformation. Notably, while cutting forces for both tool types decrease with increasing cutting speed, the difference ratio remains essentially stable.

 

Cutting Temperature Comparison

Results indicate that negative rake tools maintain consistently lower cutting temperatures than positive rake tools, typically by 15-25°C. This thermal advantage primarily stems from the negative rake design’s enhanced tooltip strength and improved heat dissipation capacity. The temperature difference becomes particularly pronounced during high-speed cutting (v>120m/min), reaching approximately 30°C.

 

Surface Quality Evaluation

Surface roughness serves as a critical indicator of machining quality. At a feed rate of f=0.15mm/rev, measurements show:

Positive rake tool surface roughness (Ra): 1.6-2.0μm

Negative rake tool surface roughness (Ra): 1.2-1.5μm

Electron microscope observations reveal that surfaces machined with negative rake tools exhibit more uniform texture patterns with fewer burrs and vibration marks. This improvement results from the negative rake design’s enhanced system rigidity that reduces cutting vibrations. Furthermore, negative rake tools maintain more stable tooltip geometry during machining, avoiding the surface quality degradation caused by micro-chipping that often occurs with positive rake tools.

 

Conclusions

1.While carbide negative rake tools show slightly inferior performance in cutting force, they demonstrate clear advantages in cutting temperature control, surface quality, and tool life.

2.The performance advantages of negative rake tools become more pronounced at higher cutting speeds, making them particularly suitable for modern high-speed machining requirements.

3.Positive rake tools excel in reducing cutting forces and are better suited for machining systems with limited rigidity.

4.Optimal tool angle selection should comprehensively consider multiple factors including workpiece material, machine tool conditions, and specific machining stages.

發(fā)表評論

電子郵件地址不會被公開。 必填項(xiàng)已用*標(biāo)注

女人被大鸡吧操逼| 亚洲免费福利视频| 爱男爽高潮鸡穴视频| 日韩午夜经典福利| 怎么样操女人的逼亚洲Av黄片段| 骚逼被狂插视频教程| 大鸡吧干小逼逼视频大全| 胸大裸体美女视频| 国产三级精品久久久久| 久久久久黑人强伦姧人妻| 99久久精品国产一区二区成人了| 人妻波多野结衣爽到喷水| 久久综合久久久久综合大| 日本入室强伦姧人妻中文| 天天干天天操天天插| 欧美日韩一级视频| 鸡巴操美女小穴羞羞视频| 美女操逼视频app| 91精品欧美久久久久久| 男生插女生下面流出白色精液视频| 三级片手机在线视频| 欧美巨屌虐无毛骚逼| 差鸡巴没码在线观看| 欧美精品国产一区二区在线观看| 美女扒开腿让男人桶爽揉| 国产日本欧美激情| 亚洲国产综合精品 在线 一区| 亚洲国际精品一区二区| 丰满少妇被强入在线观看| 日本av在线一区二区| 精品无码国产一区二区三区A| 火辣美女的操大逼| 久久亚洲精品中文字幕一| 鸡巴操美女小穴羞羞视频| 亚洲国产综合精品 在线 一区| 校花内射国产麻豆欧美一区| 一区二区三区av精品| 粉嫩小穴被大鸡巴操视频在线观看| 午夜场射精嗯嗯啊啊视频| 国产精品国产精黄 | 美女主播被操流水|